Managing Diversity In IT Department Through Cultural Intelligence
06 Feb 2008 | Print
|
Digg IT!
|
del.icio.us | Permanent Link
Mike Vizard, Editorial Director for Ziff-Davis Enterprise makes a poignant remark about the importance of diversity in the IT department in his blog “Diversity in IT Has Become a Business Imperative”. I agree with his view that “the great issue of the day in technology is not the technology but rather the people within the IT department itself”. His observation “Indians and Russians seem to prefer to work with their own. Caucasian employees form their own cliques based on age, gender, sexual orientation and ethnicity while Asians do likewise along national and sometimes even tribal lines. And, in response, Afro-Americans have now also created their own cliques”, and “The onus on preventing that from happening should fall squarely on the shoulders of IT managers who unfortunately appear to be unwilling for any number of reasons to tackle the issue head on” has some truth to it.
I think it’s not only important for the managers but for the organization’s culture to recognize the importance of enabling the collaboration among employees with diverse background. But without proper training the HR department or the management do not have the right tools to maximize the productivity and take advantage of diversity within the organization. Most of the HR departments have diversity initiative that targets the issue only superficially (based on the skin color). That may be counterproductive and no one knows how to translate diversity initiative into maximizing profits for the organizations. Hence the diversity initiative end up being only one of the many ‘HR policies’ and managers don’t get very enthusiastic in implementing it. Hence they will try to do the minimal that is mandated by the corporate HR department.
According to Martha Maznevski, professor of organizational behavior and international management at IMD, Lausanne, Switzerland, only way to leverage diversity in the organization is for individuals to develop Cultural Intelligence. According to Martha, Cultural intelligence is an ability to look at situation from both business and cultural perspective simultaneously. The link to her video where she talks on how to leverage Cultural Intelligence to manage global (in other words diverse) resource is here. If you would rather read, here is the link to the transcript of that video.
The gist of it is: There are three components of Cultural intelligence that one need to master to manage people and thus enable lateral and bottom up communication globally
Knowledge: Ability to engage in learning other’s culture, getting historical and different perspective of a nation, religion, culture or ethnicity.
Skills: Ability to master Cross cultural communication and become an effective communicator
Mindfulness: Capacity to continuously learn from our own actions and to reflect on them.
Of the 3 components of Cultural Intelligence, I personally think being Mindful is the only way one can change their behavior or communication style over the period to time but ‘Mindfulness’ is a very hazy concept that cannot be quantified. The ‘Knowledge’ and ‘Skills ‘ can be taught. How does an organization influence and provide incentives to be ‘mindful’ or become ‘reflective’? Its this sticky aspect of embracing diversity which makes it very difficult for organizations to monitor progress. That is the primary reason when the organizations talk about diversity they are more focused on attaining superficial goals (i.e. X% of minority workers). They cannot coerce employees or manager to be ‘mindful’.
There is a tremendous potential if the organizations harnesses the collective intelligence of its work force that transcends every cultural barriers, but there is no easy way for organizations to provide incentives to change those behaviors. Mind you, being mindful is a powerful ability that will differentiate individual employee from crowd. As the Globalization of Labor continues, individuals that can fine tune their communication to be culturally sensitive will no doubt succeed.
About the Author:
Raj Sheelvant, Project Manager at Intel is passionate about aligning Information Technology with business needs. Business Process Re-engineering, IT Change Management, Management Training, IT Management, Globalization, IT Strategy, Leadership Development, Public Speaking are some of his wide area of interests.
Raj Sheelvant has served as A Project Lead at Intelidata and also as a Software Engineer at Braun Simmons, prior to his occupation as the IT Project Manager at Intel, Phoenix, Arizona Area.
Educated at the BDT Engineering College, he joined the University of Toledo to earn his MS, Engineering, 1990 - 1993. He is an MBA, International Management, 2005 - 2007, from the Arizona State University, W. P. Carey School of Business.
Views expressed here belong to the author and do not represent those of the ThinkingStreet or the author’s employer
WordPress database error: [Can't open file: 'wp_comments.MYI' (errno: 144)]
SELECT * FROM wp_comments WHERE comment_post_ID = '2183' AND comment_approved = '1' ORDER BY comment_date
Effective pricing and discounting strategies are one of the key reasons why some technology professional service organizations succeed and others fail. According to the “The New Professional Service Maturity Model” benchmark report just completed by Adexta and SPI Research,
Unlike a BPO where you need to “sweat the assets” a smart KPO needs to work at both. This is what will drive sustainability, client advantage, people empowerment and make the KPO industry really a force to reckon with…
ITIL v3’s business service management approach makes it the best fit for adoption by private equity (PE) firm for deploying in their portfolio companies in order to enhance the value of their portfolio.
The commanders of India’s software service companies came together in the financial capital ‘Mumbai’ last week to celebrate, and take stock of what lies ahead. The industry is already under a cloud because of fears of strengthening rupee and the possibility of a U.S. recession.
Over the course of the last couple of years leading law firms have begun to wake up to the reality that we live and operate in a global marketplace. Technology enables an increasing array of legal support services and higher value legal work to be outsourced offshore. The legal profession is now starting to take advantage of the labor arbitrage that has been exploited by other industries for well over a decade.
SaaS (Software as a Service) or On-Demand application delivery as a disruptive delivery model is challenging traditional Enterprise applications. Adoption rate is the fastest in the SME (Small and Medium Enterprises) space. But, large multinational organizations are slow to embrace the on-demand delivery model.
Mike Vizard, Editorial Director for Ziff-Davis Enterprise makes a poignant remark about the importance of diversity in the IT department in his blog “Diversity in IT Has Become a Business Imperative”. I agree with his view that “the great issue of the day in technology is not the technology but rather the people within the IT department itself”.
Fractal is a leading provider of advanced analytics services with more than 40 clients in 15 countries. The company helps retail financial; banking and telecommunication institutions take data based decisions that enhance the effectiveness of their marketing and risk management programs.
What next in offshoring? Different folks will give different responses - Analytics, KPO, CRO, Moving up value chain, Product Development, Engineering Services, Consulting, Higher domain knowledge, Channel Development etc . This is like few blind men trying to describe an elephant. All are probably right in their own way but all are missing the big picture. This big picture in my opinion is offshoring for growth and innovation…
C Mahalingam (Mali) has more than 23 years of experience in the field of Human Resources and has held senior executive positions with leading organizations. Prior to joining Symphony Services, Mali led HR for the India operations of IBM and Hewlett-Packard as well as Philips Software Center.
Sandeep Kaujalgi